I believe that the Dean’s reasoning is muddling the presssing problem of intercourse because of the issue of wasted time.
Guess that a man that is married strung along a marriage-seeking girl without ever making love along with her (put aside for the time being why he’d do this type of thing–maybe he simply didn’t arrive at that part yet). Would the Dean nevertheless argue that the defrauded woman ended up being due some damages? Or even, have you thought to? It would appear that the expected problems for the lady would nevertheless regardless exist of whether intercourse ended up being active in the deal.
About it, lying on Tinder or directly to another person to obtain something (cash, trust, sex, etc) can be cause for a civil action for “fraud in the inducement” if you want to be legalistic and technical.
Let’s state a publishing business lies up to a prospective customer about having devices that will print 10,000 advertisements each day when it comes to customer, which will be an advertising company that really needs 10,000 brand new im im printed ads made daily.